<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Editorial Standards Phase 1 - Descriptions</title>
	<link>http://www.blog.cantufind.com/2008/03/13/editorial-standards-phase-1-descriptions/</link>
	<description>The Directory that Reviews its Websites for Quality and Safety!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cantufind.com/2008/03/13/editorial-standards-phase-1-descriptions/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.cantufind.com/2008/03/13/editorial-standards-phase-1-descriptions/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Site links have nothing to do with editorial integrity as we've explained it, the only reason they get this method of listing is due to the way they structure their directories.   But in sharp answer to your question the answer is NO they don't deserve it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site links have nothing to do with editorial integrity as we&#8217;ve explained it, the only reason they get this method of listing is due to the way they structure their directories.   But in sharp answer to your question the answer is NO they don&#8217;t deserve it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirsensei Web Directory Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cantufind.com/2008/03/13/editorial-standards-phase-1-descriptions/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirsensei Web Directory Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.cantufind.com/2008/03/13/editorial-standards-phase-1-descriptions/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Do some of the web directories with site links have editorial integrity? I don’t think so. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do some of the web directories with site links have editorial integrity? I don’t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
